• Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Newsroom
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Current Issue
    • Latest News
    • Special Report
    • Up Close
    • Opinion
  • News by Sector
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Banking & Finance
    • Health Care
    • Education & Talent
    • North Idaho
    • Technology
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Government
  • Roundups & Features
    • Calendar
    • People
    • Business Licenses
    • Q&A Profiles
    • Cranes & Elevators
    • Retrospective
    • Insights
    • Restaurants & Retail
  • Supplements & Magazines
    • Book of Lists
    • Building the INW
    • Market Fact Book
    • Economic Forecast
    • Best Places to Work
    • Partner Publications
  • E-Edition
  • Journal Events
    • Elevating the Conversation
    • Workforce Summit
    • Icons
    • Women in Leadership
    • Rising Stars
    • Best Places to Work
    • People of Influence
    • Business of the Year Awards
  • Podcasts
  • Sponsored
Home » Waste-to-energy plant turbine upgrade mulled

Waste-to-energy plant turbine upgrade mulled

One proposal would mean modification in who receives income from energy sales

February 26, 1997
Adrienne C. Dellwo

The city of Spokanes Public Works Committee is recommending a $2.4 million turbine upgrade at the waste-to-energy plant.


The facilitys turbine needs to be replaced or rebuilt about every 10 years, says Roger Flint, the committees director. The turbine is 11 years old, he says.


Wheelabrator Spokane Inc. manages the operation of the city-owned 25-megawatt facility and is contractually obligated to rebuild the turbine. That Hampton, N.H.-based company is paid by the city to incinerate waste, but currently doesnt receive proceeds from the sale of energy produced there.


Wheelabrator has given two turbine-improvement proposals to the Public Works Committee.


The first proposal, which fulfills Wheelabrators contractual obligation, would cost between $450,000 and $750,000, and calls for a basic rebuilding of the turbine. The rebuilt turbine would be about 2 percent more efficient in power production than the old turbine, which means it would generate about 500 more kilowatts, or enough to power 250 homes. That would result in increased revenue from power sales of nearly $250,000 a year, all of which would go to the citys solid waste program, Flint says.


The second proposal goes beyond whats required by contract and includes a $2.4 million upgrade of the turbine to make it more efficient. That would boost energy production about 7 percent, or by about 1.75 megawatts, enough to power 875 homes. That proposal would increase revenue by $866,000, but the city wouldnt get all of that money. Because Wheelabrator would be spending substantially more on the turbine enhancements than is required by its contract, it would receive 75 percent of the revenue increase for the first five yearsor almost $650,000 a yearto help it recoup the cost of the upgrade. The remaining 25 percent, roughly $216,000 a year, would go to the city, he says. Starting in the sixth year of use of the upgraded turbine, Wheelabrator and the city would split the proceeds evenly, each receiving about $433,000 annually.


Thus, over a 10-year period the city would receive projected revenue of about $3.2 million, compared with just $2.5 million under the less expensive proposal.


After reviewing the two proposals, the Public Works Committee decided to recommend the second proposal to the Regional Solid Waste Liaison Board, which will review the proposals and make a recommendation on them to the City Council, and if necessary, to the Spokane County Commission.


The city of Spokane owns the waste-to-energy plant and is contracted to handle solid waste disposal for Spokane County and for other cities inside the county. The Liaison Board is made up of representatives from the governing bodies of those municipalities. Solid waste proposals involving expenditures of $1 million or more need approval from both the Spokane City Council and the county commissioners, while those that are for less than $1 million need to be approved only by the City Council. All proceeds the city receives from the facility stay within the solid waste system.


Last year, a $1.25 million upgrade of the facilitys constant-speed motors improved its electrical generating capacity by about 1 megawatt. The sale of that power is expected to bring in an additional $757,000 annually.

    Latest News
    • Related Articles

      Hollister-Stier project doubles to $8 million

      Itron plans to add jobs here

      Adding a whodunit to your event

    Adrienne Dellwo

    Hollister-Stier project doubles to $8 million

    More from this author
    Daily News Updates

    Subscribe today to our free E-Newsletters!

    SUBSCRIBE

    Featured Poll

    Going into the second half of 2025, what economic factor will you be monitoring most closely?

    Popular Articles

    • Five below store exterior 1 web
      By Dylan Harris

      Five Below plans new store in Spokane Valley

    • Rite aid3 web
      By Journal of Business Staff

      Two Spokane Rite Aid stores to close

    • 40.13 fc art
      By Tina Sulzle

      $165 million development planned at CDA National Reserve

    • Cat tales13 web
      By Karina Elias

      What's Going on with: Cat Tales Wildlife Center

    • Berries49 web
      By Tina Sulzle

      Café to open in former tattoo parlor space in Valley

    • News Content
      • News
      • Special Report
      • Up Close
      • Roundups & Features
      • Opinion
    • More Content
      • E-Edition
      • E-Mail Newsletters
      • Newsroom
      • Special Publications
      • Partner Publications
    • Customer Service
      • Editorial Calendar
      • Our Readers
      • Advertising
      • Subscriptions
      • Media Kit
    • Other Links
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Journal Events
      • Privacy Policy
      • Tri-Cities Publications

    Journal of Business BBB Business Review allianceLogo.jpg CVC_Logo-1_small.jpg

    All content copyright ©  2025 by the Journal of Business and Northwest Business Press Inc. All rights reserved.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing