• Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Newsroom
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Current Issue
    • Latest News
    • Special Report
    • Up Close
    • Opinion
  • News by Sector
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Banking & Finance
    • Health Care
    • Education & Talent
    • North Idaho
    • Technology
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Government
  • Roundups & Features
    • Calendar
    • People
    • Business Licenses
    • Q&A Profiles
    • Cranes & Elevators
    • Retrospective
    • Insights
    • Restaurants & Retail
  • Supplements & Magazines
    • Book of Lists
    • Building the INW
    • Market Fact Book
    • Economic Forecast
    • Best Places to Work
    • Partner Publications
  • E-Edition
  • Journal Events
    • Elevating the Conversation
    • Workforce Summit
    • Icons
    • Women in Leadership
    • Rising Stars
    • Best Places to Work
    • People of Influence
    • Business of the Year Awards
  • Podcasts
  • Sponsored
Home » Guest Commentary: Capital gains fee would be illegal state income tax

Guest Commentary: Capital gains fee would be illegal state income tax

~

December 20, 2018
Jason Mercier

Despite substantial state revenue growth, Gov. Jay Inslee is proposing a 9 percent income tax on capital gains. This is just one of several tax increases the governor is pushing for in his massive 2019-21 budget proposal.

The governor claims his new capital gains tax is an “excise tax” and not an income tax. He does this in an attempt to avoid the state’s constitutional prohibition on graduated income taxes.

Yet, there is no debate on this point—a capital gains tax is an income tax. This according to the Internal Revenue Service, every state revenue department in the country, and just plain common sense.

As explained by the IRS: “Capital gains are treated as income under the tax code and taxed as such.”

Beside the fact a capital gains income tax is unconstitutional in Washington, imposing one would also be bad budget policy for the state. Washington currently has one of the most stable tax bases in the country; property taxes are very stable.

A capital gains income tax, however, is well known throughout the country as one of the most volatile tax sources possible.

To illustrate, California Gov. Jerry Brown in 2014 pushed for a constitutional amendment to restrict the use of capital gains for state spending. Heeding his warnings about the volatility of capital gains, California voters approved it.

The Washington Department of Revenue also had this warning regarding the 2012 capital gains income tax proposal, House Bill 2563: “Capital gains are extremely volatile from year to year. Revenue from this proposal will depend entirely on fluctuations in the financial markets and can be expected to vary greatly from the amounts presented.”

If enacted, Washington would be the only state in the country with a stand-alone income tax on capital gains. Doing this would throw away what the state Department of Commerce says is not only a “competitive advantage” for the state but also “is great marketing” for Washington. If an income tax is imposed, Commerce warned that would mean “one less tool that we have in our economic development tool box.”

Not only is a capital gains income tax unconstitutional, adopting one would inject extreme volatility into the state’s budget. This could set up a constant push year after year to raise taxes even higher to balance the budget. 

Being unconstitutional and extremely volatile demonstrates an income tax on capital gains is a true twofer of bad policy and should be rejected.

On the one hand, you have the IRS and every state revenue department in the country saying a capital gains tax is an income tax. On the other hand, you have those who are trying to evade Washington’s constitutional prohibition on graduated income taxes. Who are you going to believe?

 

Jason Mercier is the government reform director for Washington Policy Center, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization with offices in Spokane, Tri-Cities, Seattle, and Olympia. WPC is online at 

www.washingtonpolicy.org

    Latest News
    • Related Articles

      Guest Commentary: Washington lawmakers have 2.6 billion reasons to reduce taxes

      Balancing state's high court picks

    Jason Mercier

    Balancing state's high court picks

    More from this author
    Daily News Updates

    Subscribe today to our free E-Newsletters!

    SUBSCRIBE

    Featured Poll

    What is Spokane's most iconic historic building?

    Popular Articles

    • Stephanie vigil web
      By Karina Elias

      Catching up with: former news anchor Stephanie Vigil

    • 40.13 fc art
      By Tina Sulzle

      $165 million development planned at CDA National Reserve

    • Rite aid3 web
      By Journal of Business Staff

      Two Spokane Rite Aid stores to close

    • Stcu ceo lindseymyhre web
      By Journal of Business Staff

      STCU names new president, CEO

    • Centennial lofts
      By Erica Bullock

      Large Spokane Valley residential project advances

    • News Content
      • News
      • Special Report
      • Up Close
      • Roundups & Features
      • Opinion
    • More Content
      • E-Edition
      • E-Mail Newsletters
      • Newsroom
      • Special Publications
      • Partner Publications
    • Customer Service
      • Editorial Calendar
      • Our Readers
      • Advertising
      • Subscriptions
      • Media Kit
    • Other Links
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Journal Events
      • Privacy Policy
      • Tri-Cities Publications

    Journal of Business BBB Business Review allianceLogo.jpg CVC_Logo-1_small.jpg

    All content copyright ©  2025 by the Journal of Business and Northwest Business Press Inc. All rights reserved.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing