• Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Newsroom
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Current Issue
    • Latest News
    • Special Report
    • Up Close
    • Opinion
  • News by Sector
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Banking & Finance
    • Health Care
    • Education & Talent
    • North Idaho
    • Technology
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Government
  • Roundups & Features
    • Calendar
    • People
    • Business Licenses
    • Q&A Profiles
    • Cranes & Elevators
    • Retrospective
    • Insights
    • Restaurants & Retail
  • Supplements & Magazines
    • Book of Lists
    • Building the INW
    • Market Fact Book
    • Economic Forecast
    • Best Places to Work
    • Partner Publications
  • E-Edition
  • Journal Events
    • Elevating the Conversation
    • Workforce Summit
    • Icons
    • Women in Leadership
    • Rising Stars
    • Best Places to Work
    • People of Influence
    • Business of the Year Awards
  • Podcasts
  • Sponsored
Home » Too few nurses said to be involved in quality initiatives

Too few nurses said to be involved in quality initiatives

Multistate research says number of RNs involved changed little over time

May 9, 2013
News Wise

Nurses are the largest group of health care providers in the U.S., and health care leaders and experts agree that engaging registered nurses in quality improvement efforts is essential to improving our health care system, patient care, and our nation's health.

Despite studies demonstrating the value of nurse-led quality improvement efforts, too few nurses are involved in such efforts, and the number isn't growing, asserts a study published in theJournal of Nursing Care Quality.

The study, part of the larger RN Work Project funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, compared the participation levels in hospital quality improvement activities for RNs who were first licensed between 2004 and 2005, and RNs first licensed between 2007 and 2008. The research team found little difference in participation levels between the two cohorts for a variety of activities, including performance measurement, working to improve processes or systems of care, monitoring sustainability of improved practices, and efforts at performance improvement. The only exception was use of appropriate strategies to improve hand-washing compliance to reduce hospital-acquired infections.

"We expected to find a greater variation in QI (quality-improvement) participation between the two groups," says Maja Djukic, a registered nurse and assistant professor at the New York University's College of Nursing. "These findings underscore the need for hospitals to collaborate with nursing schools to develop effective strategies to ensure that RNs expect and are prepared to engage in QI activities. Nurses are an important resource in efforts to improve care and patient outcomes, and right now, that resource is too often being underutilized."

The team notes that there has been an increase in the number of hospitals that participate in formal programs aimed at increasing nurses' engagement in quality and safety initiatives since 2008. They expected that trend would increase the likelihood of participation in QI activities for the later cohort. Among those initiatives are Transforming Care at the Bedside, National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators Program, the hospital Magnet Recognition Program, and the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses initiative.

The research team cites several promising programs for engaging staff RNs in QI activities, including the Integrated Nurse Leadership Program in California, and the Bi-State Nursing Workforce Innovation Center's Clinical Scene Investigator Academy in Kansas and Missouri.

It also recommends better data systems for monitoring quality outcomes specific to nursing care, so that RNs receive timely feedback on their performance. Other recommendations for hospital leadership include having more experienced colleagues guide early-career RNs in translating newly-acquired QI knowledge into action and ensuring that staffing levels are high enough and that RNs have sufficient release time to participate in QI activities, among others.

The study was based on surveys of 539 RNs who work in hospitals in 15 states: Alabama, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia. The National Council of State Boards of Nursing Center for Regulatory Excellence provided funding for the study, in addition to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation support.

The RN Work Project is a 10-year study of newly licensed registered nurses. It's a multistate, longitudinal study of new nurses' turnover rates, intentions, and attitudes, including intent, satisfaction, organizational commitment, and preferences about work. The broad study draws on data from nurses in 34 states and the District of Columbia, covering 51 metropolitan areas and nine rural areas.

    Special Report
    • Related Articles

      Too few primary care doctors being trained, study says

      More contact said to result in fewer hospital re-entries

      Readmission rates found to be misleading

    News Wise

    Mayo Clinic seeks to dispel myths about ovarian cancer

    More from this author
    Daily News Updates

    Subscribe today to our free E-Newsletters!

    SUBSCRIBE

    Featured Poll

    Which INW summertime activity are you looking forward to the most?

    Popular Articles

    • Eckhardt ezra influencers web
      By Journal of Business Staff

      Ezra Eckhardt, STCU part ways

    • Veda lux1 web
      By Tina Sulzle

      Perry District retailer opens second location in downtown Spokane

    • Providence9 web
      By Dylan Harris

      Labcorp to acquire select assets of Spokane Valley pathology practice

    • Hillyard91 web
      By Karina Elias

      Hillyard gets creative: Spokane's first designated arts district emerges

    • E93e59eb2857f8a3d812fe0cc4ba9ed3
      By Tina Sulzle

      Cheney Depot Society lands tenant for historic train depot

    • News Content
      • News
      • Special Report
      • Up Close
      • Roundups & Features
      • Opinion
    • More Content
      • E-Edition
      • E-Mail Newsletters
      • Newsroom
      • Special Publications
      • Partner Publications
    • Customer Service
      • Editorial Calendar
      • Our Readers
      • Advertising
      • Subscriptions
      • Media Kit
    • Other Links
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Journal Events
      • Privacy Policy
      • Tri-Cities Publications

    Journal of Business BBB Business Review allianceLogo.jpg CVC_Logo-1_small.jpg

    All content copyright ©  2025 by the Journal of Business and Northwest Business Press Inc. All rights reserved.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing