• Home
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Newsroom
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Current Issue
    • Latest News
    • Special Report
    • Up Close
    • Opinion
  • News by Sector
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Banking & Finance
    • Health Care
    • Education & Talent
    • North Idaho
    • Technology
    • Manufacturing
    • Retail
    • Government
  • Roundups & Features
    • Calendar
    • People
    • Business Licenses
    • Q&A Profiles
    • Cranes & Elevators
    • Retrospective
    • Insights
    • Restaurants & Retail
  • Supplements & Magazines
    • Book of Lists
    • Building the INW
    • Market Fact Book
    • Economic Forecast
    • Best Places to Work
    • Partner Publications
  • E-Edition
  • Journal Events
    • Elevating the Conversation
    • Workforce Summit
    • Icons
    • Women in Leadership
    • Rising Stars
    • Best Places to Work
    • People of Influence
    • Business of the Year Awards
  • Podcasts
  • Sponsored
  • INW Senior
Home » Prop. 1's benefits outweigh its flaws

Prop. 1's benefits outweigh its flaws

-

March 26, 2015
Staff Report

Proposition No. 1, the looming ballot measure that would invest an estimated $275 million over 10 years to expand public transit services here, has sparked legitimate concerns among critics who question everything from its financial projections to the cost of a proposed trolley-like route addition.

We share some of those concerns, and would have preferred to see the measure phase in more gradually a proposed sales and use tax increase that would fund the improvements. However, we believe the long-term benefits that would emanate from this sizable financial investment outweigh the measure’s flaws, and we encourage voters to support it.

The special election is scheduled for April 28, but voters should begin receiving their mail-in ballots within the next couple of weeks.   

 The proposition would authorize the collection of an additional sales tax of 0.3 percent—or three cents on a $10 retail purchase—to extend hours and expand service to new areas. Nearly half of the tax receipts, though, also would go to maintaining current levels of transit service that Spokane Transit Authority officials claim otherwise would need to be scaled back. A good-sized portion of that money would be used to replace aging buses.

STA currently receives about 70 percent of its funding from a voter-approved sales tax of 0.6 percent, so this measure would boost that funding level to 0.9 percent over the 10-year span before the authorization sunsets, after which voters would need to reauthorize it.

The sunset clause, approved by a divided STA board that might not have placed the measure on the ballot otherwise, appears in hindsight to have been a smart move that would force STA to manage its added tax receipts wisely or face losing them.

STA says the added funding would enable it to provide an estimated 25 percent increase in bus service, which it expects will accommodate a 30 percent increase in ridership to more than 15 million rides a year by 2025. As part of a long-range plan, the transit authority says it would implement more than 25 improvements across the region to meet a growing demand for transit services. The service improvements are too numerous to be detailed here, but can be reviewed at stamovingforward.com.

 Assuming 2.5 percent annual growth in sales tax revenue, the ballot measure would be projected to generate $270 million between the third week of December this year and Dec. 31, 2025, with STA also kicking in $5 million from existing cash.

One capital project that has stirred considerable controversy and some lingering doubts on our part—due to uncertainties surrounding the type of vehicles that would be used—is a proposed Central City Line that would use a rubber-tired electric trolley to serve a six-mile route between Browne’s Addition and Spokane Community College. That expensive project, though, would depend heavily on grant funding and—in context—is just one piece of a much broader and laudably progressive plan to meet transit needs here for the next decade, and perhaps beyond. 

    Latest News
    • Related Articles

      The Journal's View: Prop 1 should be approved to open city's labor dealings

      Voters must resist allure, reject Prop. 1

      The Journals View: Income tax ruling turning eyes to Prop 2 measure

    Staff Report

    Spokane-area job numbers fall

    More from this author
    Daily News Updates

    Subscribe today to our free E-Newsletters!

    Subscribe

    Featured Poll

    How much are you spending on holiday shopping this year?

    Popular Articles

    • By Tina Sulzle

      Trader Joe's puts forward plans in Spokane Valley

    • Vintage (10) c
      By Tina Sulzle

      Aloha Vintage marketplace opens in Millwood

    • 1319f8394524761fe62efd46371b1cb6
      By Dylan Harris

      Silverwood to be acquired by Atlanta company

    • By Journal of Business Staff

      Nordstrom Rack eyes new North Spokane location

    • Topgolf web
      By Ethan Pack

      Topgolf project moves forward in Liberty Lake

    • News Content
      • News
      • Special Report
      • Up Close
      • Roundups & Features
      • Opinion
    • More Content
      • E-Edition
      • E-Mail Newsletters
      • Newsroom
      • Special Publications
      • Partner Publications
    • Customer Service
      • Editorial Calendar
      • Our Readers
      • Advertising
      • Subscriptions
      • Media Kit
    • Other Links
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Journal Events
      • Privacy Policy
      • Tri-Cities Publications

    Journal of Business BBB Business Review allianceLogo.jpg CVC_Logo-1_small.jpg

    All content copyright ©  2025 by the Journal of Business and Northwest Business Press Inc. All rights reserved.

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing